When it comes to high-performance chainsaws for serious forestry work, two models often appear at the top of any comparison list: the ECHO CS-7310SX and the Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq. Both are professional-grade saws, built for power, durability, and reliability under intense workloads. Whether you’re felling trees, bucking large logs, or handling storm cleanup, these two machines promise muscle and endurance. But how do they really stack up against each other?
Let’s dive deep into their specifications, performance, ergonomics, and value for money to help you decide which is best for your needs.
Engine Power and Displacement
The ECHO CS-7310SX boasts a robust 73.5cc two-stroke engine, while the Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq carries a slightly smaller 70.7cc engine. While on paper the ECHO appears to have a slight edge in displacement, power output is where things get interesting.
- The ECHO CS-7310SX generates about 5.6 horsepower.
- The Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq also produces around 5.5 horsepower, thanks to its efficient X-Torq technology that enhances combustion and reduces emissions.
In practice, both saws deliver excellent cutting power, but the ECHO’s engine feels slightly more aggressive under heavy loads, particularly in dense hardwoods.
Weight and Handling
Weight is a critical factor for professionals using chainsaws for extended periods. The Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq has a dry weight of around 6.6 kg (14.6 lbs), while the ECHO CS-7310SX comes in a bit heavier at 7.0 kg (15.4 lbs).
That 0.8 lb difference might not seem like much, but over several hours, it can affect fatigue levels—especially when limbing or working on awkward angles. Husqvarna’s excellent weight-to-power ratio and balanced design give it an ergonomic advantage. It feels lighter and easier to maneuver during long cutting sessions.
Bar Compatibility and Cutting Capacity
Both chainsaws support a wide range of bar lengths. The ECHO CS-7310SX can be paired with bars from 20” to 32”, while the Husqvarna 372XP handles 16” to 28” bars.
If you need a saw for large felling jobs or milling, the ECHO offers more flexibility with longer bars. However, Husqvarna’s faster chain speed (up to 65.62 ft/s or 20 m/s) and excellent torque make it highly efficient even with a 28” bar.
Both chainsaws use 3/8” pitch, .050” gauge chains, which are standard and easy to find.
Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
This is where Husqvarna’s X-Torq engine really shines. The X-Torq technology significantly reduces fuel consumption—by up to 20%—and cuts exhaust emissions by as much as 60%. This makes the 372XP not only environmentally friendly but also more economical in the long run.
The ECHO CS-7310SX complies with strict emission regulations (Euro 5) and delivers decent fuel efficiency, but it doesn’t quite match the Husqvarna in this regard. If you’re conscious about fuel costs and environmental impact, the 372XP is the winner here.
Starting Systems and Maintenance
Both chainsaws come equipped with features to make starting easier:
- ECHO CS-7310SX uses a decompression valve, digital ignition system, and a heavy-duty air filter to ensure smooth starting and reliable operation even in cold conditions.
- Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq has Smart Start®, a compression release valve, and a carburetor compensator to maintain engine performance even as the air filter gets dirty.
In terms of air filtration, the Husqvarna 372XP again takes a slight lead with its centrifugal air cleaning system, which removes larger debris particles before they reach the air filter. This reduces maintenance intervals and keeps performance high.
However, ECHO’s heavy-duty two-piece air filter and tool-less access to the filter and spark plug make maintenance simple and user-friendly.
Vibration and Comfort
When you’re working for hours, vibration becomes more than a nuisance—it can lead to injury. Both models offer effective anti-vibration systems.
- ECHO CS-7310SX uses a rubber-mounted anti-vibe system that reduces hand strain.
- Husqvarna 372XP features a low-vibration design with strategically placed vibration dampeners. It is especially well-known for its comfortable grip and low hand-arm vibration levels.
In real-world use, the Husqvarna feels slightly more comfortable over long durations.
Price and Value
In terms of cost, both saws are premium models:
- ECHO CS-7310SX is generally slightly less expensive, ranging around $950–$1,050 USD.
- Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq typically retails around $1,100–$1,200 USD, depending on the bar length and dealer.
While the ECHO offers strong power and bar length flexibility at a slightly lower price, the Husqvarna justifies its higher cost with better fuel efficiency, lower emissions, and superior ergonomics.
Pros and Cons
ECHO CS-7310SX Pros:
- Slightly more powerful engine
- Supports longer bar lengths
- Simpler maintenance access
- Lower price point
ECHO CS-7310SX Cons:
- Heavier than the Husqvarna
- Slightly less fuel-efficient
- Higher vibration over long periods
Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq Pros:
- Lightweight and better balanced
- Excellent fuel efficiency and lower emissions
- Smooth operation with low vibration
- Easier handling during extended use
Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq Cons:
- Slightly more expensive
- Max bar length is shorter than ECHO
Final Verdict
So which one is right for you?
If you’re looking for raw power, longer bar compatibility, and a slightly lower purchase price, the ECHO CS-7310SX is a formidable choice. It’s a powerhouse that gets the job done and is built to last.
But if you prioritize ergonomics, fuel savings, and long-term comfort, the Husqvarna 372XP X-Torq edges out as the more refined tool. It’s efficient, reliable, and easier on the body during long workdays.
For professional loggers, landscapers, and serious homeowners alike—both are worthy contenders. Your final decision depends on whether power or finesse matters most for your cutting needs.
