In the world of professional chainsaws, few names carry as much weight as Stihl and Husqvarna. These two brands have earned their place as titans in forestry, logging, and heavy-duty land clearing. Among their top-tier machines, the Stihl MS 660 and the Husqvarna 395 XP stand out as “evergreen” legends—beloved by pros and respected by competitors. Despite the passage of time and the release of newer models, these two saws continue to command attention. So, how do they stack up against each other? Let’s dive into a head-to-head comparison of these legendary saws to help you decide which evergreen beast might suit your needs best.
1. Introduction to the Giants
The Stihl MS 660 has been a workhorse for loggers and arborists for decades. Known for its raw power, durability, and simplicity, it remains a favorite even after being succeeded by the MS 661. The MS 660 is often used in felling massive trees, ripping through hardwood, or bucking logs in extreme conditions.
The Husqvarna 395 XP, on the other hand, is another time-tested machine. With a reputation for a smooth cutting experience and long bar capabilities, this saw is popular among loggers working in large-scale operations. Like the MS 660, the 395 XP is designed for professionals who need a serious tool to get serious jobs done.
2. Engine Power and Performance
At the heart of every chainsaw is its engine, and both of these models come equipped with high-displacement two-stroke engines.
- Stihl MS 660:
- Engine Displacement: 91.6 cc
- Power Output: 7.0 hp (5.2 kW)
- Husqvarna 395 XP:
- Engine Displacement: 93.6 cc
- Power Output: 6.6 hp (4.9 kW)
While the Stihl has a slight edge in horsepower, the Husqvarna counters with a slightly larger displacement. The MS 660 offers incredible torque and is known for a “muscle-car” type feel—direct, aggressive, and raw. The 395 XP, while a touch softer in horsepower, provides a smoother and more consistent cutting experience, especially with longer bars. Ultimately, both saws deliver enough punch for the toughest jobs, but the Stihl might appeal more to those who crave that high-octane power.
3. Bar Compatibility and Cutting Capacity
Both saws are designed to run long bars and cut through massive timber.
- Stihl MS 660: Supports bar lengths from 20″ to 36″
- Husqvarna 395 XP: Supports bar lengths from 18″ to 36″ (and even longer with modifications)
The Husqvarna 395 XP is often favored when working with very long bars—up to 42 inches in some customized setups—thanks to its torque curve and chain oiling capabilities. It’s especially effective in milling and deep cutting, where precision and consistent lubrication are crucial. The MS 660 handles long bars well but shines best with 32″ or under for maximum performance.
4. Weight and Ergonomics
Weight is a critical factor when using these big saws for extended periods.
- Stihl MS 660: 7.4 kg (16.3 lbs) without bar and chain
- Husqvarna 395 XP: 7.9 kg (17.4 lbs) without bar and chain
The Stihl is slightly lighter, which may reduce fatigue over long workdays. However, Husqvarna is often praised for its LowVib anti-vibration system and superior balance, especially with longer bars. Ergonomics on the Husqvarna make it feel lighter in hand than it really is, offering better handling over time.
5. Build Quality and Durability
Both machines are built to take abuse. The MS 660 and the 395 XP are constructed using high-quality magnesium crankcases, durable polymer covers, and reliable componentry.
- Stihl MS 660: Its reputation for bulletproof reliability is well-earned. Many MS 660s remain in service for over a decade with proper care.
- Husqvarna 395 XP: Built with longevity in mind, especially in harsh environments like cold weather, wet forests, and dusty mills.
Parts availability and maintenance ease are solid on both models. However, some users note that Husqvarna’s air filtration and maintenance access may be more intuitive, while Stihl’s simplicity is appreciated for quick fixes in the field.
6. Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
Modern forestry equipment is increasingly focused on efficiency and emissions control. While both of these saws are slightly older designs and not as clean-burning as the newest models, they still offer respectable performance.
- Stihl MS 660: Slightly higher fuel consumption but delivers more aggressive power
- Husqvarna 395 XP: Known for better fuel economy during long cuts, thanks in part to its X-Torq technology (available in updated variants)
If you’re doing a lot of long cutting or milling work, the 395 XP might give you a bit more run time per tank.
7. Sound and Vibration
These are not quiet saws—nor are they intended to be. But when you’re working long hours, vibration and noise levels can make a big difference in fatigue and safety.
- Stihl MS 660: Known for a deeper, throatier exhaust note; more vibration compared to modern standards.
- Husqvarna 395 XP: Offers a higher-pitched sound but comes with superior anti-vibration features that make a noticeable difference over time.
Husqvarna’s LowVib system reduces operator strain, especially for those doing full days of felling or cutting.
8. Price and Parts Availability
Though no longer in production as new models, both the MS 660 and 395 XP can still be found through secondhand markets, dealers, or rebuilt options.
- MS 660: Often fetches a premium because of brand loyalty and performance reputation. Aftermarket parts are widely available.
- 395 XP: Slightly more affordable, and also supported with a broad network of OEM and aftermarket parts.
Choosing between the two may come down to availability in your area, and whether you value service access or long-term support.
9. Which One Should You Choose?
Both the Stihl MS 660 and Husqvarna 395 XP are timeless tools—evergreen saws that continue to dominate in rugged professional use. Choosing one over the other depends on your preferences and work style.
- Choose the Stihl MS 660 if you:
- Want raw, explosive power
- Prefer a slightly lighter saw
- Are already invested in Stihl gear
- Need a reliable tool for mid to heavy felling jobs
- Choose the Husqvarna 395 XP if you:
- Use longer bars regularly
- Want better fuel efficiency
- Need smoother, vibration-reduced operation
- Do a lot of milling or consistent deep cuts
9. Which One Should You Choose?
Both the Stihl MS 660 and Husqvarna 395 XP are timeless tools—evergreen saws that continue to dominate in rugged professional use. Choosing one over the other depends on your preferences and work style.
- Choose the Stihl MS 660 if you:
- Want raw, explosive power
- Prefer a slightly lighter saw
- Are already invested in Stihl gear
- Need a reliable tool for mid to heavy felling jobs
- Choose the Husqvarna 395 XP if you:
- Use longer bars regularly
- Want better fuel efficiency
- Need smoother, vibration-reduced operation
- Do a lot of milling or consistent deep cuts
Conclusion: Evergreen vs. Evergreen
Calling both of these saws “evergreen” is no exaggeration. They have withstood the test of time, earned the loyalty of seasoned loggers, and remain symbols of unmatched strength in the woods. Whether you go with the thunderous MS 660 or the enduring 395 XP, you’re wielding more than just a tool—you’re holding a legend.
In the end, both saws are winners. It’s not about which one is better—it’s about which one is better for you.
