For professional loggers, arborists, and serious forestry workers, Husqvarna is a name that resonates with power, durability, and performance. Two of its most powerful chainsaws—the Husqvarna 592 XP and the Husqvarna 572 XP—often come head-to-head in discussions about top-tier saws for heavy-duty work. Both are high-performance machines built for demanding tasks, but each has its unique strengths.
If you’re choosing between the two, understanding their differences in power, design, features, and intended usage is essential. This comprehensive comparison breaks down the pros and cons of each model to help you make an informed decision.
1. Power and Performance
The most significant difference between the 592 XP and the 572 XP lies in engine size and output.
- Husqvarna 592 XP
This model is a powerhouse. It comes with a 92.7cc engine and delivers a maximum power output of 7.6 horsepower (hp). It is designed to handle the toughest jobs, like felling large trees and working through dense hardwood. The 592 XP can support guide bars up to 36 inches, giving it a broader cutting capacity. - Husqvarna 572 XP
Slightly more modest in power, the 572 XP sports a 70.6cc engine with a max output of 5.8 hp. That’s still very impressive and more than enough for most professional tasks, including limbing, felling, and bucking. The saw works well with bars up to 28 inches.
Verdict: The 592 XP clearly leads in sheer power, but that doesn’t automatically make it the better saw for every job. The 572 XP strikes a balance between power and manageability.
2. Weight and Handling
Power often comes with added weight, and the 592 XP is no exception.
- 592 XP: Weighs approximately 16.3 lbs (without cutting equipment).
- 572 XP: Comes in lighter at about 14.5 lbs.
While the weight difference might not seem huge on paper, it becomes noticeable during extended use. If you’re working all day or performing overhead cuts, the lighter 572 XP may cause less fatigue.
Both chainsaws have ergonomic designs and Husqvarna’s anti-vibration technology, reducing operator strain and improving control.
Verdict: The 572 XP is easier to handle and more comfortable for long shifts or complex positioning.
3. Cutting Speed and Efficiency
Husqvarna designed both chainsaws for high cutting efficiency, but with a slightly different focus.
- 592 XP: Thanks to its AutoTune 3.0 and Smart Start features, it delivers excellent throttle response and improved engine performance. It maintains high torque even at lower RPMs, which makes it ideal for big wood and high-load conditions.
- 572 XP: It shines in cutting speed. The saw’s slim design, optimal center of gravity, and impressive RPM (max 9,900 rpm) make it highly responsive and ideal for fast-paced limbing and felling.
Verdict: The 592 XP dominates in raw torque and load-handling, while the 572 XP wins in agility and cutting speed for medium-sized trees.
4. Technology and Features
Both saws come with Husqvarna’s latest innovations:
- Air Injection™ System: Extends engine life by keeping dirt and debris out.
- X-Torq® Technology: Reduces fuel consumption and emissions.
- AutoTune™: Automatically adjusts the engine for optimal performance based on altitude, temperature, and fuel quality.
- LowVib® Technology: Minimizes vibration for operator comfort.
The 592 XP includes AutoTune 3.0, a more advanced version with even faster adaptation to changing conditions. It also features Connectivity Ready options, so you can pair it with Husqvarna’s Fleet Services for maintenance tracking and diagnostics.
Verdict: The 592 XP has a slight edge in technology, particularly for professionals who want digital performance tracking.
5. Durability and Build Quality
Both models are rugged and built for extreme use. Husqvarna is known for its solid magnesium crankcases and high-quality components.
- 592 XP: Designed for heavy logging, it includes a more robust clutch and gear housing for longevity under high torque.
- 572 XP: Durable, but its components are slightly lighter to keep the weight down, making it better suited for versatility rather than brute strength.
Verdict: Both are built to last, but the 592 XP can take more abuse in extreme conditions.
6. Maintenance and Serviceability
Ease of maintenance is important for professionals who rely on their equipment daily.
- Both models offer tool-less air filter access, easy-to-clean air filters, and transparent fuel tanks.
- The 572 XP features a pre-filter system that extends filter life and reduces maintenance frequency.
- The 592 XP, with its digital connectivity option, gives insights into run time, service intervals, and diagnostics—ideal for logging companies or individuals with large tool inventories.
Verdict: The 592 XP is more service-oriented for professionals with advanced tracking needs.
7. Price
Price can be a deciding factor for many users.
- 592 XP: Generally priced higher, reflecting its larger engine, increased power, and advanced features.
- 572 XP: More affordable while still offering top-tier performance.
For those on a budget or who don’t need maximum power, the 572 XP offers excellent value.
Verdict: The 572 XP wins on price-to-performance ratio.
Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?
It ultimately comes down to your specific needs.
Choose the Husqvarna 592 XP if:
- You handle large-diameter hardwoods regularly.
- You need maximum power and torque.
- You want the latest in smart saw technology.
- You’re operating in a commercial forestry or logging environment.
Choose the Husqvarna 572 XP if:
- You want a lighter, faster saw for versatile forestry work.
- You value agility and balance for long days on the job.
- You want great performance at a slightly lower cost.
Both chainsaws represent the best in Husqvarna’s lineup, and each is exceptional in its own way. Whether you go with raw strength or efficient versatility, you’re getting a high-quality tool that delivers professional-grade results.
