When it comes to professional-grade chainsaws, two names consistently rise to the top: Husqvarna and Stihl. Known for their rugged performance, powerful engines, and durability, both brands have earned the respect of loggers, arborists, and forestry workers worldwide. Two standout models in their lineup — the Husqvarna 592 XP and the Stihl MS 880 — represent the pinnacle of their heavy-duty chainsaw engineering. But how do these giants measure up when placed head-to-head?
In this detailed comparison, we’ll take a close look at the power, performance, features, ergonomics, and overall value of the Husqvarna 592 XP and the Stihl MS 880 to help you determine which one is better suited for your work.
1. Engine Power and Displacement
Let’s begin with the engine specs — the heart of any chainsaw.
- Husqvarna 592 XP
- Engine Displacement: 92.7 cc
- Power Output: 7.6 hp
- Max RPM: 9,600 rpm
- Stihl MS 880
- Engine Displacement: 121.6 cc
- Power Output: 8.6 hp
- Max RPM: 9,000 rpm
Clearly, the Stihl MS 880 is the larger, more powerful machine on paper. Its massive 121.6cc engine delivers a serious punch, making it a top choice for extreme logging or cutting large hardwoods. The 592 XP, while slightly less powerful, offers impressive performance and high RPM, which gives it faster cutting in many applications.
Winner: Stihl MS 880 for raw power, but the 592 XP isn’t far behind in practical use.
2. Cutting Performance and Bar Compatibility
Both chainsaws can handle long bars and deep cuts, but they cater to slightly different cutting scenarios.
- Husqvarna 592 XP is typically paired with bars up to 36 inches, optimized for fast, aggressive cutting in all types of wood. Thanks to its high RPM, it offers excellent chain speed, making it ideal for felling and limbing with precision.
- Stihl MS 880 accepts bars up to 59 inches and is designed for extremely demanding tasks like milling and cutting massive timber. Its torque is unmatched, but it comes at the cost of weight and maneuverability.
Winner: Tie, depending on your use case. The 592 XP is better for mobility and speed, while the MS 880 is king of the deep cut.
3. Weight and Ergonomics
Professional chainsaw users know how important weight and handling are for productivity and safety during long workdays.
- Husqvarna 592 XP weighs around 16.3 lbs (without bar and chain), making it relatively lightweight for its power class. It also features an ergonomic design, a well-balanced frame, and low vibration levels thanks to Husqvarna’s anti-vibration technology.
- Stihl MS 880 weighs a hefty 22.3 lbs (without bar and chain). It’s not designed for finesse or long hours of limbing — it’s a brute force machine. Its handling is noticeably more tiring, especially for overhead work or extended use.
Winner: Husqvarna 592 XP, for better balance and comfort.
4. Technology and Features
Modern chainsaws are equipped with smart features that improve safety, performance, and ease of use.
- Husqvarna 592 XP
- AutoTune 3.0 for optimal engine settings in any conditions
- Air Injection for longer filter life
- Easy start system with a decompression valve
- Connectivity-ready with built-in sensor technology
- Stihl MS 880
- Lacks many electronic enhancements
- Manual carburetor tuning
- Robust build quality and proven mechanical reliability
The 592 XP is far more technologically advanced, offering self-tuning capabilities and user-friendly features that increase uptime and efficiency. The MS 880, while powerful, is built more traditionally, relying on manual adjustments and fewer electronic aids.
Winner: Husqvarna 592 XP, for modern tech and ease of use.
5. Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
Fuel economy matters, especially when using a saw daily.
- Husqvarna 592 XP is designed with X-Torq technology, which reduces fuel consumption and emissions while maintaining high torque. It meets global emissions regulations with ease.
- Stihl MS 880, being an older design, is less fuel-efficient and higher in emissions. It’s still compliant in many markets, but newer models from Stihl have started to replace it in some regions due to stricter emission laws.
Winner: Husqvarna 592 XP, for cleaner, greener operation.
6. Maintenance and Durability
When you’re deep in the forest, you need a saw that’s tough and reliable.
- Husqvarna 592 XP features a magnesium crankcase, heavy-duty air filtration, and easy-to-access parts for fast servicing. Its self-adjusting carburetor helps maintain consistent performance with minimal downtime.
- Stihl MS 880 is known for its rugged build and long-term reliability. Many professionals consider it a “tank” that just keeps going, especially in the most punishing environments. However, its maintenance can require more frequent manual tuning.
Winner: Tie — both are durable, but the 592 XP offers quicker maintenance while the MS 880 shines in extreme durability.
7. Price and Availability
- Husqvarna 592 XP typically retails between $1,300 and $1,500 USD, depending on bar length and dealer location.
- Stihl MS 880 can cost $1,500 to $1,900 USD. However, in some regions, it has been phased out and replaced by the MS 881 — making availability a challenge.
Winner: Husqvarna 592 XP, for better value and wider availability in many markets.
Final Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?
Choose the Husqvarna 592 XP if:
- You need a high-performance saw with advanced tech.
- You prioritize ergonomics, speed, and fuel efficiency.
- You do a lot of felling, limbing, or all-day forestry work.
Choose the Stihl MS 880 if:
- You need unmatched torque and raw power.
- You work in extreme conditions or mill large logs.
- You value mechanical simplicity over modern features.
Both chainsaws are top-tier professional tools. Your choice comes down to your specific needs: the Husqvarna 592 XP is the modern, nimble powerhouse, while the Stihl MS 880 is the heavy-duty legend.
