When it comes to debating the future stars of the NBA, few panels generate as much passion, insight, and disagreement as the trio of Stephen A. Smith, Monica McNutt, and Jay Williams. Their recent on-air discussion about Indiana Pacers point guard Tyrese Haliburton lit up social media, with @stephenasmith pushing back against the notion that Haliburton has already “arrived” as a bona fide superstar. Meanwhile, @mcnuttmonica and @realjaywilliams passionately argued the opposite, citing Haliburton’s breakout performances and leadership as evidence that his time is now.
So, has Tyrese Haliburton truly arrived? Or are we witnessing premature coronation?
Stephen A. Smith: “Not So Fast”
Stephen A. Smith, never one to mince words, drew a clear line in the sand: “I like Haliburton. I love his game. He’s an elite passer, a smart decision-maker, and a rising talent. But let’s not throw the word ‘superstar’ around too lightly. A couple of big games in November or December doesn’t make you the face of the league.”
Smith’s argument hinges on consistency, playoff impact, and the intangible “it” factor that separates stars from superstars. “Superstars make you sit down. They make you cancel plans. They make ticket prices go up in every city,” he said. “And as good as Haliburton is, I don’t see people lining up yet to watch him.”
He also pointed out that Haliburton, though leading the Pacers with impressive stats, still needs to prove he can carry a team deep into the postseason. “You don’t get the superstar crown until you’ve shown up when it matters most,” Smith declared. “Regular season flashes are cute. Championships and legacy moments—that’s superstar territory.”
Monica McNutt: “This Kid is Special—Now”
Monica McNutt strongly disagreed. She challenged the traditional criteria for superstardom, saying, “If we’re waiting for playoff runs to define who’s a superstar, we’re ignoring the evolution of the game and how stars emerge now.”
McNutt highlighted Haliburton’s basketball IQ, elite court vision, and leadership, especially in clutch moments. “He’s not just playing well—he’s elevating everyone around him,” she said. “Look at how the Pacers’ offense flows through him. He makes the right reads, he scores efficiently, and he doesn’t force things. That’s superstar stuff.”
She also referenced his role in leading Indiana to a surprisingly strong position in the Eastern Conference. “You can’t say this team is overachieving without giving Tyrese his flowers. He’s orchestrating everything. He’s one of the best point guards in the league already, and his impact is undeniable.”
Jay Williams: “Haliburton Has Arrived”
Jay Williams went a step further, stating plainly, “Tyrese Haliburton isn’t just a rising star—he’s here. He’s arrived. Period.”
Williams emphasized Haliburton’s demeanor on and off the court. “He’s not flashy in the traditional sense, but he controls games like a ten-year vet. He’s giving you 20 and 10 on great efficiency. He’s unselfish but fearless when it’s time to take over. That’s what we ask of superstars.”
He compared Haliburton’s impact to early-stage Steve Nash and Chris Paul, noting that both point guards were underestimated at first due to their calm demeanors and playmaking-first styles. “Haliburton is cut from that cloth. He might not scream superstar like Ja Morant or Zion with highlight dunks, but his game speaks volumes.”
Jay also mentioned that the NBA’s definition of superstardom is shifting. “We’re in a different era. Social media, advanced stats, the way fans consume the game—being a superstar isn’t just about highlights or rings anymore. It’s about being essential to your team’s identity and winning culture. Haliburton checks those boxes.”
The Numbers Don’t Lie
Statistically, Haliburton has been putting up All-NBA caliber numbers. Averaging over 20 points and 10 assists per game, with elite shooting splits and one of the highest assist-to-turnover ratios in the league, he’s been the engine behind Indiana’s surprisingly potent offense. He’s also taken on a clear leadership role, commanding respect from veterans and emerging stars alike.
According to advanced metrics, his on/off impact rivals many of the league’s elite. The Pacers’ offense drops significantly when he sits, showing just how integral he is to their success.
The Verdict?
So who’s right?
The disagreement really boils down to how we define superstardom. If we’re using the old-school definition—dominant playoff performances, cultural impact, global appeal—Stephen A. might have a point. Haliburton still has to prove himself in the crucible of postseason basketball.
But if we’re recognizing elite impact, consistency, leadership, and the ability to raise a franchise’s ceiling, then McNutt and Williams make a compelling case. Haliburton is doing everything a superstar should be doing—he just hasn’t had the national stage yet to cement it.
In the end, this debate might not have a clear winner… yet. But one thing is undeniable: Tyrese Haliburton is no longer just “one to watch.” Whether you call him a superstar or not, he’s forcing everyone—analysts, fans, and defenders—to pay attention.
And as the season unfolds, one thing is certain: the conversation isn’t over.
