Husqvarna 592 XP vs. Husqvarna 395 XP: A Chainsaw Showdown

When it comes to professional-grade chainsaws, Husqvarna has long been a leader in the industry. Two models that often come up in discussions among forestry professionals and serious users are the Husqvarna 592 XP and the Husqvarna 395 XP. These chainsaws are built for demanding tasks like felling large trees, milling lumber, or handling extreme cutting jobs. But how do they compare side-by-side, and which one is better for your needs?

Let’s dive into a detailed comparison of the 592 XP and the 395 XP in terms of power, weight, design, technology, durability, and overall value.

Engine Power and Performance

One of the most important features of any chainsaw is its engine. In this area, both models offer impressive specs, but there are some notable differences.

  • Husqvarna 592 XP: Equipped with a 92.7cc engine, the 592 XP delivers a powerful 7.6 horsepower (hp). It’s designed with a newer generation of engine technology (X-Torq), which improves fuel efficiency and reduces emissions without sacrificing performance. This model is also optimized for high torque across a wide RPM range, making it suitable for tough jobs and heavy-duty cutting.
  • Husqvarna 395 XP: With a slightly smaller 93.6cc engine (yes, technically a little larger in displacement), the 395 XP produces around 6.6 hp. This model has been a favorite for decades due to its raw power and reliability, but it lacks some of the fuel efficiency and modern refinement seen in the 592 XP.

Verdict: The 592 XP wins in terms of overall horsepower and engine technology. It brings more power to the table while using less fuel.

Weight and Handling

Chainsaw weight plays a huge role in fatigue, especially during long days in the field. Handling also affects precision and safety.

  • Husqvarna 592 XP: Weighs approximately 16.3 lbs (7.4 kg) without cutting gear. Despite being powerful, it’s engineered with a more balanced body and improved ergonomics. The front handle is angled better for comfort, and the saw feels more stable during operation.
  • Husqvarna 395 XP: Comes in at around 17.4 lbs (7.9 kg), slightly heavier than the 592 XP. The design is more traditional and rugged, which some users may appreciate, but it’s not as well-balanced or refined as the newer model.

Verdict: The 592 XP edges out again with a lighter frame and more modern ergonomics, making it easier to handle for longer periods.

Cutting Performance

Cutting ability doesn’t rely solely on engine power—it also includes bar length compatibility, chain speed, and overall cutting efficiency.

  • Husqvarna 592 XP: This saw supports bars up to 36 inches. It features Husqvarna’s AutoTune 3.0 system, which automatically adjusts the engine to account for air filter condition, altitude, temperature, and fuel quality. This results in smoother starts and optimized cutting regardless of conditions. Its chain speed is fast, and with the X-Cut chain, users report a noticeable increase in cutting performance.
  • Husqvarna 395 XP: Also supports bars up to 36 inches. It has excellent torque and is great for tough wood, but it requires manual carburetor tuning. This means more effort to maintain optimal performance, especially in changing weather or altitudes.

Verdict: While both saws are strong cutters, the 592 XP wins again for its adaptive cutting technology and superior chain speed.

Technology and Features

Here’s where the biggest difference between the two models lies.

  • Husqvarna 592 XP:
    • AutoTune 3.0: Automatically adjusts carb settings for peak performance.
    • X-Torq Engine: Reduces fuel consumption and emissions.
    • Air Injection™: Keeps the filter cleaner longer.
    • Connectivity: Supports Husqvarna’s Fleet Services for tracking usage, service intervals, and diagnostics via Bluetooth.
    • User-friendly design: Better grip, balanced body, and easier starts.
  • Husqvarna 395 XP:
    • Simpler, more mechanical design.
    • No AutoTune or smart features.
    • Uses older-generation technology.

Verdict: For users who want modern features and lower maintenance, the 592 XP is clearly more advanced.

Durability and Build Quality

Husqvarna is known for building long-lasting tools, and both models are extremely tough.

  • Husqvarna 592 XP: Made with modern materials and updated construction methods. Its magnesium crankcase and high-end components ensure it stands up to extreme use. Despite its newer design, it has proven durable in real-world testing.
  • Husqvarna 395 XP: This saw has a legendary reputation for toughness. Many loggers have used it for 10+ years with proper maintenance. It’s built like a tank and has fewer electronic components that can fail.

Verdict: 395 XP wins here, especially for those who prefer a purely mechanical machine with a proven track record.

Maintenance and Parts Availability

  • 592 XP: As a newer model, parts are still being rolled out and may not be as readily available in all areas yet. It’s also more complex due to electronics, which might require special tools or dealer support.
  • 395 XP: Because it’s been around for decades, parts are widely available and most experienced chainsaw mechanics are familiar with it. Simpler design means easier DIY fixes.

Verdict: 395 XP wins for ease of maintenance and global parts availability.

Price and Value

  • Husqvarna 592 XP: Typically retails for a higher price, often between $1,300–$1,500 USD, depending on bar size and dealer.
  • Husqvarna 395 XP: Slightly less expensive, around $1,100–$1,300 USD, and prices may vary due to its longer presence in the market.

Verdict: 395 XP offers better value upfront, while the 592 XP provides more features for the investment.

Final Recommendation: Which Should You Choose?

Both saws are top-tier machines. The right choice depends on your priorities.

  • Choose the Husqvarna 592 XP if:
    • You want the most modern technology.
    • Fuel efficiency and cleaner emissions are important.
    • You prefer easier starts and less tuning.
    • You want Bluetooth tracking and advanced ergonomics.
  • Choose the Husqvarna 395 XP if:
    • You value proven reliability over new tech.
    • You prefer simple mechanical systems.
    • You’re used to tuning carburetors and handling basic repairs.
    • You need a slightly more affordable yet still powerful saw.

Conclusion

In the battle of Husqvarna 592 XP vs. Husqvarna 395 XP, the 592 XP stands out as the more advanced, powerful, and user-friendly chainsaw. However, the 395 XP remains a reliable workhorse with a loyal following. If you’re ready to embrace the future of forestry equipment, the 592 XP is worth the upgrade. But if you’re a traditionalist who trusts the old ways, the 395 XP still delivers top-tier performance in the toughest conditions.

Either way, with Husqvarna, you’re getting quality, durability, and performance built to last.