When it comes to powerful chainsaws for professional and heavy-duty use, few names command more respect than STIHL and Husqvarna. Within their impressive lineups, the STIHL MS 660 and the Husqvarna 285 CD stand out as legendary saws that have earned cult followings among loggers, arborists, and serious outdoor enthusiasts. Though these models are from different eras — the MS 660 being a more recent powerhouse and the 285 CD hailing from the 1980s — they often come up in discussions about which classic workhorse reigns supreme.
In this article, we’ll pit the STIHL MS 660 against the Husqvarna 285 CD, comparing their performance, build quality, ease of use, and value. Whether you are a professional in the woods or a collector of vintage chainsaws, understanding these two models can help you decide which one best fits your needs — or simply appreciate their engineering excellence.
A Brief History
The STIHL MS 660 was introduced as a successor to the iconic STIHL 066 and designed for high-performance cutting in logging operations, especially with larger bars up to 36 inches. It’s a saw that represents the peak of STIHL’s traditional two-stroke power before the MS 661 C-M, which introduced more computerized controls.
Meanwhile, the Husqvarna 285 CD (where “CD” stands for “Capacitor Discharge” ignition) was released in the early 1980s and represents one of Husqvarna’s early serious attempts at creating a truly professional-grade saw for global markets. It has a reputation for durability, raw power, and simplicity — attributes that still attract enthusiasts and professionals today, despite its age.
Engine Power and Performance
STIHL MS 660
- Engine displacement: 91.6 cc
- Power output: 7.0 horsepower (5.2 kW)
- Weight (powerhead only): 7.4 kg (16.3 lbs)
Husqvarna 285 CD
- Engine displacement: 85.7 cc
- Power output: approximately 5.2 horsepower (3.9 kW)
- Weight (powerhead only): around 7.0 kg (15.4 lbs)
When you compare raw numbers, the STIHL MS 660 clearly produces more horsepower and slightly more torque, making it better suited for tasks like milling, felling massive trees, or bucking large logs quickly. However, it’s also heavier, which can tire users out faster during prolonged use.
The Husqvarna 285 CD, despite slightly less power, is highly respected for its “torquey” engine, meaning it can dig in and keep cutting even under heavy load. It feels a bit lighter in the hands compared to the 660, and its power delivery is very smooth — a characteristic many vintage Husqvarna fans love.
Build Quality and Durability
Both saws are built like tanks, with magnesium crankcases and high-quality parts designed for harsh conditions.
The STIHL MS 660 benefits from modern engineering improvements. Its anti-vibration system, for instance, is more advanced, offering a smoother and less fatiguing experience over long cutting sessions. STIHL also engineered better air filtration systems into the 660, meaning longer run times between cleanings and better engine protection.
The Husqvarna 285 CD, by contrast, is a simpler design with fewer electronics and “smart” features — and that’s a big reason it’s still running strong for many owners today. Simplicity often means reliability. The 285 CD’s capacitor discharge ignition was innovative at the time, offering easier starting compared to earlier systems.
In summary, both are rugged, but the STIHL MS 660 may be easier to maintain under heavy, dusty, or extreme field conditions, thanks to improved air filtration and vibration dampening.
Ease of Use
Starting and handling are critical factors, especially with saws this powerful.
- Starting: The STIHL MS 660 has a modern decompression valve that greatly eases starting. Its newer ignition system also ensures quicker firing in most conditions.
- Starting the Husqvarna 285 CD can sometimes be trickier, especially if not maintained well. However, once tuned properly, it starts reliably.
- Handling: The MS 660 feels a bit heavier upfront due to its larger top end and more powerful motor. It’s designed to pull very long bars, so it can feel “overbuilt” for smaller tasks.
- The Husqvarna 285 CD, with its slightly smaller engine and better weight distribution, can feel more nimble — an advantage in technical felling operations or when limbing.
Ultimately, if you’re working all day, the MS 660’s modern ergonomics might save you from more fatigue. But if you like a nimble yet still extremely capable saw, the 285 CD has a classic feel that’s hard to beat.
Availability of Parts and Service
STIHL MS 660 parts are widely available. Whether you need OEM or aftermarket parts, you can usually find what you need quickly. Many shops still service MS 660s because the saw has remained popular long after its initial release.
Husqvarna 285 CD parts can be harder to come by. Some parts are now obsolete, and you may need to search through online marketplaces or specialty vintage saw parts dealers. However, because it shares some parts with other Husqvarna models from the same era (like the 2100 or 288XP), it’s not impossible to keep a 285 CD running strong with some effort.
If ease of maintenance is important to you, the STIHL MS 660 holds the advantage.
Price and Value
On the used market, a well-maintained STIHL MS 660 often fetches a high price — sometimes even close to what it cost new, reflecting its continued desirability among professionals. Given its robust power and modern features, many feel the price is justified.
The Husqvarna 285 CD is more of a collector’s item today. While it can still work as hard as ever, its value often lies in its vintage appeal and the pride of owning a piece of chainsaw history. Prices vary widely depending on condition, but expect to pay a premium for a fully functional, well-kept 285 CD.
If you need a working saw for daily heavy logging, the MS 660 is the safer investment. If you love vintage machines or want something unique, the 285 CD offers a satisfying and nostalgic ownership experience.
Final Verdict
Choosing between the STIHL MS 660 and the Husqvarna 285 CD ultimately depends on your needs and preferences:
- If you want raw power, easier maintenance, modern features, and ready parts support, the STIHL MS 660 is the clear winner.
- If you admire vintage craftsmanship, prefer a lighter handling saw, and don’t mind hunting for parts now and then, the Husqvarna 285 CD could be the perfect addition to your equipment lineup.
Both chainsaws are legends in their own right. Whether you lean toward the modern muscle of the MS 660 or the old-school toughness of the 285 CD, either one will serve you well — and remind you why STIHL and Husqvarna are names trusted by generations of woodcutters.
