When it comes to chainsaws, two brands stand out in the industry: Stihl and Husqvarna. Both companies have earned their reputation for producing high-quality, durable, and efficient chainsaws that cater to a variety of needs, from professional logging to home yard work. Among their most popular models are the Stihl MS 362 and the Husqvarna 562 XP. In this comprehensive comparison, we will take a close look at these two chainsaws, evaluating their design, performance, features, and overall value.
1. Introduction to the Stihl MS 362
The Stihl MS 362 is a mid-range chainsaw designed for professional use, though it can also serve homeowners who need a more powerful machine for larger projects. Stihl has built a reputation for creating robust and reliable tools, and the MS 362 is no exception. The chainsaw is powered by a 59.0 cc engine and is known for its excellent cutting performance and fuel efficiency.
The MS 362 features a low-emission engine, complying with environmental regulations while still delivering impressive power. Its anti-vibration system ensures comfort during long hours of operation, while the magnesium casing reduces weight, making the saw easier to handle.
2. Introduction to the Husqvarna 562 XP
The Husqvarna 562 XP is another powerhouse in the world of professional chainsaws. This model, like the Stihl MS 362, is designed for heavy-duty use in forestry, logging, and other demanding tasks. The 562 XP is powered by a 59.8 cc engine, which provides excellent torque and high cutting capacity. Husqvarna is known for its innovative engineering, and the 562 XP features several technological advancements that make it one of the best chainsaws in its class.
The 562 XP comes with an X-Torq engine that provides more power while reducing emissions and fuel consumption. Its LowVib system minimizes vibration, and the ergonomically designed handle ensures maximum comfort during extended use. The saw is also equipped with an efficient air filtration system, making maintenance easier and increasing the lifespan of the engine.
3. Engine and Performance
Both the Stihl MS 362 and Husqvarna 562 XP are powered by high-performance engines, but there are subtle differences in their design and performance characteristics.
The Stihl MS 362 boasts a 59.0 cc engine that provides a good balance between power and fuel efficiency. Its engine is equipped with Stihl’s M-Tronic system, which automatically adjusts the fuel mixture for optimal performance in varying conditions. This feature helps the saw maintain consistent power, even when working in challenging environments. The MS 362 is known for its smooth cutting performance, particularly when felling trees or cutting through dense wood. The saw’s engine provides a maximum power output of 4.6 horsepower (3.4 kW), which is plenty for most professional cutting tasks.
The Husqvarna 562 XP, on the other hand, is equipped with a slightly larger 59.8 cc engine. It delivers a maximum power output of 4.3 horsepower (3.2 kW), which is marginally less than the Stihl MS 362. However, the 562 XP benefits from Husqvarna’s X-Torq technology, which optimizes the engine for both power and fuel efficiency. The X-Torq engine reduces exhaust emissions and lowers fuel consumption, making it more environmentally friendly without sacrificing performance. Like the Stihl MS 362, the Husqvarna 562 XP offers consistent power and smooth cutting performance, especially for professionals who need a reliable tool for heavy-duty tasks.
4. Design and Weight
When it comes to design, both chainsaws are built with ergonomics and comfort in mind, but they each take slightly different approaches.
The Stihl MS 362 features a lightweight design, thanks to its magnesium alloy housing. This makes the saw relatively easy to handle and reduces operator fatigue during long working hours. The saw weighs approximately 13.2 lbs (5.99 kg) without the bar and chain, making it a bit lighter than some other saws in its class. Its compact size and well-balanced design help improve maneuverability, and the anti-vibration system reduces hand and arm strain.
The Husqvarna 562 XP, by contrast, weighs 13.4 lbs (6.06 kg), which is slightly heavier than the Stihl MS 362. However, it features a well-balanced design, and the LowVib system effectively reduces vibrations, making it comfortable to use for extended periods. The ergonomic handle design is another highlight, as it helps reduce hand strain and provides better control during cutting tasks.
Both chainsaws are well-designed and comfortable to use, but the Stihl MS 362 has a slight edge in terms of weight and overall maneuverability.
5. Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
Both brands have made significant strides in improving fuel efficiency and reducing emissions in their chainsaws, and this is evident in the performance of both the MS 362 and 562 XP.
The Stihl MS 362 features an advanced fuel management system, with a low-emission engine that meets environmental standards without compromising on power. It uses Stihl’s 2-Mix engine technology, which mixes air and fuel in a way that reduces emissions and improves fuel efficiency. The result is longer operating times and fewer trips to refuel, making the MS 362 a great choice for professionals working in remote areas.
The Husqvarna 562 XP is equipped with an X-Torq engine, which is designed to reduce fuel consumption by up to 20% and emissions by 60%. The system also ensures that the saw provides maximum power while using less fuel, which is not only environmentally friendly but also cost-effective in the long run. The improved air filtration system on the 562 XP helps keep the engine clean, reducing the frequency of maintenance and increasing the chainsaw’s lifespan.
In terms of fuel efficiency and emissions, both chainsaws perform exceptionally well, with the Husqvarna 562 XP offering slightly better fuel efficiency thanks to the X-Torq technology.
6. Maintenance and Durability
Both chainsaws are built for durability and designed to be easy to maintain, but each has its own approach to these factors.
The Stihl MS 362 is equipped with a long-life air filtration system, which helps prevent debris from entering the engine and reduces the need for frequent cleaning. Its tool-less fuel and oil cap system makes refueling quick and convenient. Additionally, the MS 362 features a side-access chain tensioning system, allowing for easy chain adjustments without the need for tools. The saw is designed to be durable, with a robust construction that can withstand the rigors of professional use.
The Husqvarna 562 XP also features an easy-to-access air filtration system, which ensures that the engine stays clean and operates efficiently. The tool-free chain tensioning system allows for fast adjustments, and the saw’s QuickRelease air filter is easy to remove for cleaning. Like the Stihl MS 362, the Husqvarna 562 XP is designed to be durable and resistant to wear and tear, making it a reliable choice for long-term use.
In terms of maintenance, both saws are relatively easy to service, but the Husqvarna 562 XP stands out with its innovative air filtration system, which is particularly effective at keeping the engine clean and reducing the frequency of maintenance.
7. Conclusion: Which One to Choose?
When it comes down to choosing between the Stihl MS 362 and Husqvarna 562 XP, both chainsaws offer outstanding performance and reliability. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs and preferences.
If you prioritize lightweight design, maneuverability, and comfort, the Stihl MS 362 might be the better option for you. Its slightly lighter weight and smooth, powerful performance make it ideal for a wide range of professional and personal cutting tasks.
On the other hand, if you’re looking for a fuel-efficient chainsaw with cutting-edge technology like X-Torq and LowVib systems, the Husqvarna 562 XP is an excellent choice. It’s designed for professionals who need maximum power and durability, and its superior fuel efficiency and innovative features make it stand out in the market.
Both chainsaws are excellent choices for those who need a reliable, high-performance tool, and choosing between them depends on factors like weight, comfort, and specific technological preferences.
