When it comes to high-performance professional chainsaws, two models frequently dominate the conversation: the STIHL MS 462 and the HUSQVARNA 572 XP. These two powerful tools are designed for demanding forestry work, heavy-duty felling, and cutting large volumes of timber. But which one is right for you? In this article, we’ll compare these two top-tier chainsaws based on performance, weight, handling, features, maintenance, and overall value.
1. Power and Performance
Let’s start with the heart of any chainsaw: its engine. The STIHL MS 462 is equipped with a 72.2 cc engine, producing around 6.0 horsepower. On the other hand, the HUSQVARNA 572 XP features a slightly larger 70.6 cc engine but delivers approximately 5.8 horsepower. Although the MS 462 has a slight edge in power output, both saws are more than capable of handling the most demanding tasks in forestry and logging.
One of the key performance aspects to consider is torque. The Husqvarna 572 XP is known for delivering better torque at lower RPMs, which can be an advantage when cutting through tough hardwoods or dealing with thicker logs. The MS 462, in contrast, revs a bit faster and may feel snappier when making quick cuts.
Verdict: STIHL MS 462 for peak horsepower; HUSQVARNA 572 XP for consistent torque and heavy-duty logging.
2. Weight and Balance
A crucial factor for professionals who use chainsaws for extended periods is weight. The STIHL MS 462 shines in this category. At just 13.2 lbs (6.0 kg) without fuel or bar, it is one of the lightest chainsaws in its class. The Husqvarna 572 XP, meanwhile, weighs around 14.5 lbs (6.6 kg) under the same conditions.
That weight difference may not seem like much, but over a long day in the woods, it can translate into reduced fatigue and better maneuverability. STIHL has designed the MS 462 to be especially agile and responsive, making it a favorite for climbing, limbing, and precision felling.
Verdict: STIHL MS 462 wins for being lighter and easier to handle.
3. Cutting Speed and Chain Options
Both saws are designed to accommodate large bars—up to 28 inches or more—making them suitable for felling large trees. In terms of chain speed, the MS 462 typically runs at higher RPMs, giving it a slight edge in fast cutting scenarios.
The Husqvarna 572 XP, however, offers the X-Cut C85 full chisel chain as an option, which is known for long-lasting sharpness and improved cutting efficiency. Paired with its excellent torque, this chain allows for consistent performance even in wet or frozen wood.
Verdict: Tie. MS 462 for faster RPMs; 572 XP for chain durability and cutting consistency.
4. Technology and Features
Both STIHL and Husqvarna have packed their saws with advanced features to enhance performance and user comfort.
STIHL MS 462 comes with:
- M-Tronic™ electronic engine management for optimal performance in all conditions.
- HD2 air filter that resists clogging and extends run time between cleanings.
- Decompression valve for easier starting.
- Elastostart™ handle to reduce the strain of start-up.
HUSQVARNA 572 XP includes:
- AutoTune™ to adjust the engine for altitude, temperature, and fuel quality.
- Air Injection™ system for longer filter life.
- LowVib™ technology for reduced vibrations during long sessions.
- Magnesium crankcase for improved durability and cooling.
In terms of digital engine tuning, both M-Tronic and AutoTune are highly regarded. However, many users report that STIHL’s system offers slightly more precise control in variable conditions, while Husqvarna’s AutoTune is praised for its reliability in remote forestry environments.
Verdict: Tie. Both saws are highly advanced and packed with smart tech.
5. Durability and Maintenance
Both the MS 462 and 572 XP are built to last. STIHL is known for its rugged German engineering, with a focus on minimizing maintenance through features like the HD2 filter and easy-to-clean design. Meanwhile, Husqvarna’s 572 XP is built with a magnesium crankcase and efficient cooling system that protects the engine under prolonged use.
Serviceability is another consideration. Some users find STIHL chainsaws harder to service due to proprietary parts and limited online support. Husqvarna, in contrast, often receives praise for being more user-friendly in maintenance and easier to repair in the field.
Verdict: Husqvarna 572 XP for easier maintenance; STIHL MS 462 for filter and build durability.
6. Ergonomics and User Comfort
When it comes to ergonomics, both chainsaws deliver a professional-grade experience. The STIHL MS 462 is exceptionally well-balanced, and its lightweight design means it’s easier on the shoulders and arms during long hours of cutting.
The Husqvarna 572 XP has a slightly chunkier feel but is equipped with LowVib™ technology, which minimizes vibration. This can help reduce fatigue and protect against vibration-related injuries like white finger syndrome.
Both saws offer excellent anti-vibration systems and are designed with the professional logger in mind.
Verdict: STIHL for nimbleness and light weight; Husqvarna for vibration reduction.
7. Price and Availability
Pricing can vary by region and dealer, but generally, both chainsaws are positioned at the higher end of the market due to their professional-grade features. The STIHL MS 462 often retails slightly higher than the 572 XP, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious buyers.
Another point is availability. STIHL typically requires in-person pickup from certified dealers, while Husqvarna models can often be purchased online or from a wider range of retailers.
Verdict: Husqvarna 572 XP for better availability and slightly more affordable pricing.
Conclusion: Which Chainsaw Wins?
Choosing between the STIHL MS 462 and the HUSQVARNA 572 XP comes down to your specific needs:
- Choose the STIHL MS 462 if you prioritize light weight, speed, and refined engine control. It’s ideal for professionals who climb, limb, or cut all day long.
- Go with the HUSQVARNA 572 XP if you want torque, ease of maintenance, and all-day comfort, especially when felling large trees or working in remote conditions.
In the end, both are phenomenal saws that serve different types of users. Whether you’re a seasoned logger or a professional arborist, you can’t go wrong with either of these industry giants.
