When it comes to professional-grade chainsaws, STIHL and Husqvarna are two of the most respected brands in the industry. Both the STIHL MS 661 and the Husqvarna 585 are high-performance chainsaws designed for heavy-duty forestry work, logging, and felling large trees. Choosing between these two models can be challenging, as each has its strengths and features that cater to different user preferences. In this detailed comparison, we’ll analyze their specifications, performance, durability, ease of use, and overall value to determine which chainsaw is the better choice for your needs.
1. Overview of STIHL MS 661 and Husqvarna 585
STIHL MS 661
The STIHL MS 661 is a professional-grade chainsaw built for large-scale forestry and logging operations. It is known for its high power output, fuel efficiency, and durability.
Key Features:
- Engine Power: 91.1 cc engine
- Power Output: 7.2 hp
- Weight: 16.5 lbs (without bar and chain)
- Fuel Capacity: 27.9 oz
- Guide Bar Length Options: 20” to 36”
- Chain Type: 3/8” pitch
- Advanced Technology: M-Tronic electronic engine management for optimal performance
- Vibration Reduction: Anti-vibration system for improved comfort
- Air Filtration: HD2 filter for extended run times and better dust filtration
Husqvarna 585
The Husqvarna 585 is a relatively new model in Husqvarna’s professional chainsaw lineup. It combines traditional, robust technology with modern advancements to deliver high power and reliability.
Key Features:
- Engine Power: 86 cc engine
- Power Output: 6.9 hp
- Weight: 17.4 lbs (without bar and chain)
- Fuel Capacity: 26.4 oz
- Guide Bar Length Options: 20” to 36”
- Chain Type: 3/8” pitch
- Advanced Technology: X-Torq engine for lower emissions and improved fuel efficiency
- Vibration Reduction: LowVib system for reduced operator fatigue
- Air Filtration: Heavy-duty air filter system for extended life
2. Performance Comparison
Power and Cutting Performance
- The STIHL MS 661 has a slight edge in power output at 7.2 hp compared to the Husqvarna 585’s 6.9 hp. This means the MS 661 can cut through large logs slightly faster and with more efficiency.
- Both models support 20” to 36” guide bars, making them suitable for cutting thick timber.
- The STIHL M-Tronic system provides automatic engine adjustments based on environmental conditions, ensuring optimal performance at all times.
- The Husqvarna 585’s X-Torq engine is designed to reduce emissions and fuel consumption while maintaining high power.
Weight and Handling
- The STIHL MS 661 weighs 16.5 lbs, making it almost a pound lighter than the Husqvarna 585 (17.4 lbs).
- The difference in weight may not seem significant, but during long hours of cutting, the lighter MS 661 can reduce operator fatigue.
- Both chainsaws feature advanced anti-vibration systems that minimize strain on the user’s hands and arms.
3. Durability and Maintenance
Build Quality and Durability
- Both chainsaws are built for heavy-duty use and feature robust construction materials.
- The Husqvarna 585 is designed with a magnesium crankcase and reinforced components to enhance longevity.
- The STIHL MS 661 also has a durable magnesium crankcase, with a high-quality polymer housing for added strength.
Maintenance and Air Filtration
- The STIHL MS 661 has an HD2 air filter, which is highly effective in filtering out fine dust and debris, extending the life of the engine.
- The Husqvarna 585 comes with a heavy-duty filtration system, but it lacks some of the self-adjusting capabilities of STIHL’s M-Tronic system.
- Husqvarna chainsaws are generally easier to service due to their simpler design, while STIHL models often require specialized servicing.
4. Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
- The Husqvarna 585 has the advantage of the X-Torq engine, which reduces fuel consumption and emissions while maintaining strong cutting power.
- The STIHL MS 661 is fuel-efficient but lacks an explicit emissions-reducing technology like Husqvarna’s X-Torq.
- For eco-conscious users, the Husqvarna 585 may be the better choice as it meets stricter environmental regulations.
5. Price and Value
- The STIHL MS 661 generally has a higher price point, often retailing between $1,300 and $1,500, depending on the bar length and location.
- The Husqvarna 585 is slightly more affordable, typically ranging between $1,200 and $1,400.
- Both chainsaws offer great value for professional loggers, but the MS 661’s M-Tronic system and lighter weight may justify the higher price for some users.
6. Pros and Cons of Each Chainsaw
STIHL MS 661
✅ Pros:
- Higher horsepower (7.2 hp)
- Lighter weight (16.5 lbs)
- M-Tronic system for automatic adjustments
- Excellent air filtration system
- Reliable and powerful cutting performance
❌ Cons:
- Higher price
- Requires specialized servicing
- Fuel efficiency is slightly lower than Husqvarna 585
Husqvarna 585
✅ Pros:
- Lower emissions and improved fuel efficiency with X-Torq engine
- Heavy-duty construction for durability
- Slightly lower price than MS 661
- Easier to service and maintain
❌ Cons:
- Heavier weight (17.4 lbs)
- Lacks automatic engine adjustment like STIHL’s M-Tronic system
- Slightly less horsepower (6.9 hp)
7. Which One Should You Choose?
Choose the STIHL MS 661 If:
- You need maximum power (7.2 hp) for heavy-duty cutting.
- You prefer a lighter chainsaw for reduced fatigue.
- You value automatic engine adjustments (M-Tronic) for consistent performance.
- You’re okay with paying a bit more for advanced technology.
Choose the Husqvarna 585 If:
- You want a more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly chainsaw.
- You prefer a chainsaw that’s easier to service and maintain.
- You need a durable workhorse for long-term use.
- You’re looking for a slightly more affordable alternative.
Final Verdict
Both the STIHL MS 661 and Husqvarna 585 are powerful, professional-grade chainsaws with impressive features. The STIHL MS 661 offers higher horsepower, lighter weight, and advanced engine management, making it a top choice for loggers who need maximum performance. On the other hand, the Husqvarna 585 provides better fuel efficiency, easier maintenance, and robust durability, making it a great option for those prioritizing long-term use and eco-friendliness.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize cutting speed, ease of use, and advanced technology, the STIHL MS 661 is worth the investment. If you’re looking for a reliable, fuel-efficient alternative, the Husqvarna 585 is an excellent choice. Either way, both chainsaws will deliver exceptional performance for demanding forestry tasks.
